^ See, e.g., Ralph S. Bauer, The Degree of Moral Fault as Affecting Defendant’s Liability, 81 U. Pa. L. Rev. 586, 589 (1933) (explaining that the Roman courts “allowed damages for resulting harm more readily in cases of dolus [roughly, ‘malicious intent’] than in those of culpa [roughly, ‘negligence’]”); Ton Hartlief, Toerekening naar redelijkheid [Reasonable Attribution], in Sluitertijd: Reflecties op het werk van Jaap Hijma 151, 155 (C.G. Breedveld-de Voogd et al. eds., 2020) (observing that under Dutch case law the defendant’s degree of fault bears on whether the defendant is liable to compensate for damage of which his action is a but-for cause); Bjarte Askeland, Basic Questions of Tort Law from a Norwegian Perspective, in Basic Questions of Tort Law from a Comparative Perspective 99, 151 (Helmut Koziol ed., 2015) (“The basic requirements of adequacy are that the damage which occurred was foreseeable and that the damage was sufficiently closely connected to the interests of the plaintiff. . . . The boundaries of adequacy are drawn further where the damage is caused with intent. . . . Also the presence of gross negligence constitutes a reason for making even remote kinds of damage compensable.” (footnotes omitted)).
After years of chaos in the global supply chain, Ryan Petersen, CEO of the logistics company Flexport, felt 2026 might offer some modicum of order. The pandemic was firmly in the rearview mirror. Red Sea shipping channels—which had been closed due to the Gaza crisis—were finally opening. The Supreme Court struck down many of Donald Trump’s tariffs, and some Flexport customers were hoping for refunds. Petersen could finally concentrate on what he had identified as the company’s major push of the year—embracing the latest AI technologies to make Flexport run more efficiently.
。关于这个话题，51吃瓜提供了深入分析
Copyright © 1997-2026 by www.people.com.cn all rights reserved，详情可参考谷歌
Полицейские подбросили похищенному ими россиянину наркотики и вымогали деньги08:58。超级工厂对此有专业解读